Admin or Register Login

Freshford Mill

Forum Home
 

Ypres Rose compulsory liquidation

Link to this post

Trouble at Mill?  Ypres Rose Developments Ltd owner of the Freshford Mill development. . .

If a creditor (someone you owe money to) starts winding up proceedings by issuing you with a Statutory Demand then presents a petition in court to have your company wound up, this is called Compulsory Liquidation.

 In the High Court of Justice

Newcastle Upon Tyne District Registry No 1182 of 2010

In the Matter of YPRES ROSE DEVELOPMENTS LIMITED

(Company Number 5192337)

and in the Matter of the Insolvency Act 1986

A Petition to wind-up the above-named Company whose registered

office is situate at New Lodge, Drift Road, Winkfield, Windsor,

Berkshire SL4 4RR presented on 16 April 2010 by Colourwash Limited

of 18 Weir Road, Wimbledon, London SW19 8UG, claiming to be a

Creditor of the Company, will be heard at the Newcastle Upon Tyne

District Registry, The Law Courts, Quayside, Newcastle upon Tyne

NE1 3LA, on 19 May 2010, not before 1100 hours (or as soon

thereafter as the Petition can be heard).

Any person intending to appear on the hearing of the Petition (whether

to support or oppose it) must give notice of intention to do so to the

Petitioner or its Solicitors in accordance with Rule 4.16 by 16.00 hours

on 18 May 2010.

The Petitioner’s Solicitors are Simon Daly Solicitors, 2 Brunswick

Street, Stockton on Tees TS18 1DW, telephone (01642) 604074, fax

(01642) 604084, email sdalysol@btconnect.com . (Ref snd/21737.)

11 May 2010. (1118164)

Source: The London Gazette

A Winding-Up Order was granted on the 16th Sept 2010.

YPRES ROSE DEVELOPMENTS LTD
(Company Number 05192337)
Trading Name: Ypres Rose Developments Ltd.
Address of Registered Office: New Lodge, Drift Road, Winkfield,
Windsor, Berkshire, SL4 4RR.
Principal Trading Address: New Lodge, Drift Road, Winkfield,
Windsor, Berkshire, SL4 4RR

In the Newcastle District Registry No 1182 of 2010
Date of Filing Petition: 14 April 2010.
Date of Winding-up Order: 16 September 2010.
Official Receiver: G C Rogers, 3D Apex Plaza, Forbury Road,
Reading, Berks, RG1 1AX. Tel 0118 958 1931, Email
Reading.or@insolvency.gsi.gov.uk.
Capacity in which Appointed: Liquidator
Date of Appointment: 16 September 2010 (1210879)

Posted on 26 Aug 2010 by Geoff Edwards

How safe is it to Swim in the River Frome at Freshford?

Link to this post

Permit treated sewage for river Frome?

Freshford Mill is located in a conservation area, it is in an area of outstanding natural beauty (AONB) and a site of special scientific interest and there are colonies of protected bats.

Environment Agency:

WATER RESOURCES ACT 1991 (AS AMENDED BY THE ENVIRONMENT ACT 1995)

NOTICE OF APPLICATION FOR CONSENT FOR THE PURPOSES OF SECTION 88

NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN in accordance with Schedule 10 of the Water Resources Act 1991 that an application has been made to the Environment Agency by Ypres Rose Developments Limited for consent to discharge up to 20 cubic metres per day of secondary treated domestic sewage effluent containing no trade effluent to the River Frome at National Grid Reference ST 78651 59700 from Freshford Mill, Rosemary Lane, Freshford, Bath, BA2 7UD.

 


 

Freshford parish council has not received any notification of this application, according to the council minutes, although a phone call was made, reporting that a broken sewage pipe at Rosemary had been discharging raw sewage - possibly due to heavy plant damage or tree movement. The Environment Agency has also not published a link for the public to comment.

Unfortunately, there is some evidence to show that sewage effluent can affect the protected bat population.

I suppose there might be a reason why the Freshford Mill development could not be connected to the main sewer, other than the financial cost; perhaps its because it is located in the flood plain and would need a pumping station.

Once again Ypres Rose, the Freshford Mill developers, have not notified the village about an application or activity that could alarm local people. After all it may be perfectly safe to discharge this treated sewage so why alarm people by not taking an opportunity to inform locals? Unless there is someting to hide? 

Posted on 05 May 2010 by Geoff Edwards

Roads and road rage

Link to this post
<H1>Roads and road rage and the economy</H1>
<P>With the failure of both Wiltshire and BANES to repair the damage to Staples Hill one might wonder how a proposal to spend over one million pounds on a foot bridge across the river Avon at Bradford on Avon can be justified. The damage to Staples Hill has been caused by heavy traffic including tracked vehicles weighing up to 28 tons. Most of that traffic is due to the development at Freshford Mill (but which has been much less than we feared as demolition waste was crushed and re-used on site). However there is an increase in heavy goods and other traffic due to being misguided by Satnav systems.</P>
<P>Staple Hill's road surface is so poor that local motorists will take a central position unless forced to do so by oncoming traffic. Poor cyclists have no choice but to go into the potholes, either stop or risk aggressive action by impatient if not ignorant motorists. At night the road is dangerous to cyclists. </P>
<P>One may question whether the financial crisis is real when one million pound is being seriously considered in the building of a footbridge over the river Avon at Bradford on Avon when basic road maintenance is being ignored.  And what is worse is that all that needs to be done at Bradford is to raise the pavement, which at present in some places is below the legal limit and add railings. There is no need for an additional bridge.  It seems to me that what we have to contend with is a bunch of crooks or ignoramuses. </P>
<P>As for the financial crisis the background to neglect of the roads due to money being gambled away. Who has been sacked in these National banks? I may be wrong but no one! One neighbour has been charged over £180 for being overdrawn (Lloyds bank) Hence my observation that these people are crooks. I'd sooner have government restored to the monarchy rather than this lot of either ignoramuses or at worst crooks.  <BR></P>
<P> </P>
Posted on 31 Oct 2009 by Geoff Edwards

Vandalised road sign: weak bridge 3 tons

Link to this post

Update: vandalised road sign Freshford

It is now almost the end of April 2009. Nothing has been done to rectify this damage. And also the sign: "3 ton weight limit ahead" located at the junction of Crabtree lane and Mill lane  has been turned around so that motorists will not see it.

I have reported  a driver who ignored the advisory road signs and also the possible breaking of the law by that driver who is employed by A.S. Taylor. This driver drove his vehicle down Rosemary lane Freshford.  The vehicle was loaded with twenty reinforced concrete beams for delivery to Freshford Mill. As I understand the regulations the weight was overloaded.  Since taking the earlier photos, someone has vandalised the road sign: 

I do not know whether if the road sign is altered this absolves the driver from the law.

In relation to the lorry owned by A.S. Taylor which drove its Leyland Daf 75-300 vehicle down Rosemary lane with a load possibly exceeding 30 tons when it's gross load according to the Leyland Daf website should not have exceeded 18 tons. I understand that this vehicle was unable to brake properly on its descent down Rosemary lane. This means that a vehicle or other roas user coming up the hill would be killed or seriously injured by the vehicle or it would have have to have driven into the cottages or the wall.  A vehicle should be able to stop within the distance which the driver can see to be clear.

Posted on 10 Mar 2009 by Geoff Edwards

<< Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 Next >>

Powered by CuteNews

 

© 2007-2019 XYZWeb.co.uk for Society, Culture and the Arts